Best Answer - Justgoodfolk
Communism is revolutionary socialism, that’s all. Other forms of socialism believe reforms can eventually lead to socialism or even that capitalism can be corrected to have humane results. What all reformist movements share however is that they inevitably slide to the right over time. Even UK’s labour is supposed to be a socialist party.
The only true, realistic socialism is communism which has nothing to do with stalinism or the Soviet regimes. Most socialist who reject communism do so because they regrettably identify it with Stalinsim, the antithesis of Marxism
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…
The 20th century saw no shortage of revolutionary struggles. In the end, however, the international workers movement was unable to overthrow world capitalism. It has long been fashionable among ex-radicals and incurable skeptics to blame the defeats suffered by the working class on the working class itself, and use them to assert that the Marxist conception of the revolutionary role of proletariat is fundamentally flawed.
The Trotskyist movement has always insisted on examining the role of leaders, political parties and programs when investigating the cause of missed opportunities and defeats. An examination from this standpoint reveals that time and again the revolutionary strivings of the working class were blocked by political movements that in one form or another capitulated to the capitalist status quo. The only basis for preventing the repetition of past defeats and setbacks and preparing for future victories is to draw the lessons of these experiences and evaluate the political role of various leaders, parties, trade unions, etc. That is why we take seriously the record of different political tendencies and the role they have played in the class struggle.
Time and again opportunists have defended their betrayal of principles by claiming to be realistic politicians, not guided by “inflexible” dogmas and who understand how to adapt their practice to the requirements of any given situation. Time and again, such “realistic” politics have led to disaster - precisely because they were based on superficial, impressionistic, non-Marxist and, consequently, unrealistic and false appraisals of objective conditions and the dynamics of the class struggle.
But opportunism is not merely the product of an intellectual and theoretical error. It has substantial socio-economic roots in capitalist society, and develops within the workers’ movement as an expression of the pressure of hostile class forces. All significant manifestations of opportunism - from that of Bernstein, which arose within the German Social Democracy at the end of the 19th century, and that of Stalin, which grew inside the Bolshevik Party in the 1920s, to that of Pablo and Mandel, which developed in the early 1950s inside the Fourth International, and, finally, to the opportunism of the British Workers Revolutionary Party that led to its break from the ICFI in the mid-1980s - can be traced to the influence exerted by bourgeois and petty-bourgeois social forces upon the working class. This is the underlying cause and significance of revisionism and opportunist politics. The struggle against such tendencies is not a distraction from party building, but, rather, the highest point at which the fight for Marxism in the working class is engaged.
The Socialist Equality Party, in political solidarity with the ICFI, defends the classical Marxist conception - developed systematically by Lenin in the construction of the Bolshevik Party and carried forward by Trotsky in the struggle to found and build the Fourth International - that revolutionary socialist consciousness does not develop spontaneously in the working class. Socialist consciousness requires scientific insight into the laws of historical development and the capitalist mode of production. This knowledge and understanding must be introduced into the working class, and this is the principal task of the Marxist movement. This was precisely the point that Lenin emphasized in What Is To Be Done? when he wrote: “Without revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement.” Apart from the efforts of the revolutionary party to introduce Marxist theory into the workers’ movement, the predominant form of mass working class consciousness will remain at the level of trade unionism, defined by Lenin as the “bourgeois consciousness” of the working class. Denigration of the struggle for revolutionary consciousness, which is usually combined with demagogic attacks on intellectual and Marxist “elitism,” is the stock-in-trade of reactionary academics and political opportunists.
Source(s):
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/oct200…
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/sep200…